000 | 02277nam a22002417a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
005 | 20210923122218.0 | ||
008 | 210922b2018 ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
020 | _a9781108628983 (ebook) : | ||
040 | _aMAIN | ||
041 | _aENG | ||
082 | _a341 | ||
245 |
_aThe Return of the Home State to Investor-State Disputes : _bBringing Back Diplomatic Protection? _c[electronic resource] / _hby Rodrigo Polanco. |
||
260 |
_aCambridge : _bCambridge University Press, _c2018. |
||
300 | _a1 online resource (342 p.) | ||
440 | _aCambridge International Trade and Economic Law. | ||
500 | _aTable of contents: Chapter 1. The Age of Diplomatic Protection of Foreign Investors Chapter 2. The Rise of and Backlash against Investor–State Arbitration Chapter 3. Home States and the Prevention of Investment Disputes Chapter 4. Home State Role in ISDS Together with the Host State Chapter 5. Unilateral Home State Participation in ISDS Chapter 6. Current and Future Roles of Diplomatic Protection in Investment Disputes Chapter 7. Home State Limitations on Diplomatic Protection Conclusion | ||
504 | _aIncludes bibliography and index. | ||
520 | _a "This book advances the idea that in order to address some of the criticisms against investor-state dispute settlement, a large majority of states have taken a 'normative' strategy, negotiating or amending investment treaties with provisions that potentially give more control and greater involvement to the contracting parties, and notably the home state. This is particularly true of agreements concluded in the past fifteen years. At the same time, there is a potential revival of the 'remnants' of diplomatic protection that are embedded in investment treaties since the beginning of the system. But why is the home state being brought back into a domain from which it was expressly excluded several decades ago? Why would a home state be interested in intervening in these conflicts? Is this 'new' role of the home state in foreign investment disputes a 'return' to diplomatic protection of its nationals, or are we witnessing something different?" | ||
650 | _aLaw. | ||
650 | _aDispute Resolution and Mediation. | ||
856 |
_3Cambridge core online _uhttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108628983 |
||
942 | _cEBK | ||
999 |
_c17067 _d17067 |