Shared authority : (Record no. 17478)
[ view plain ]
000 -LEADER | |
---|---|
fixed length control field | 02047nam a22001931i 4500 |
005 - DATE & TIME | |
control field | 20220507172020.0 |
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
fixed length control field | 150326s2015 enk ob 001 0 eng d |
020 ## - ISBN | |
International Standard Book Number | 9781474201186 |
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE | |
Original cataloging agency | NLUO |
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Kyritsis, Dimitrios, |
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
Title | Shared authority : |
Sub Title | courts and legislatures in legal theory |
Medium | [electronic resource] / |
Statement of responsibility, etc. | by Dimitrios Kyritsis. |
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
Pages | 1 online resource (viii, 172 pages). |
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
General note | Bloomsbury Pub Ebook |
504 ## - BIBLIOGRAPHY, ETC. NOTE | |
Bibliography, etc | Includes bibliographical references and index. |
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
Summary, etc. | "This important new book advances a fresh philosophical account of the relationship between the legislature and courts, opposing the common conception of law, in which it is legislatures that primarily create the law, and courts that primarily apply it. This conception has eclectic affinities with legal positivism, and although it may have been a helpful intellectual tool in the past, it now increasingly generates more problems than it solves. For this reason, the author argues, legal philosophers are better off abandoning it. At the same time they are asked to dismantle the philosophical and doctrinal infrastructure that has been based on it and which has been hitherto largely unquestioned. In its place the book offers an alternative framework for understanding the role of courts and the legislature; a framework which is distinctly anti-positivist and which builds on Ronald Dworkin's interpretive theory of law. But, contrary to Dworkin, it insists that legal duty is sensitive to the position one occupies in the project of governing; legal interpretation is not the solitary task of one super-judge, but a collaborative task structured by principles of institutional morality such as separation of powers. Moreover in this collaborative task, different participants have a moral duty to respect each other's contributions."--Bloomsbury Publishing. |
650 #0 - SUBJECT | |
Subject | Law (Philosophical concept) |
856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
Uniform Resource Identifier | https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474201186?locatt=label:secondary_bloomsburyCollections |
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
Koha item type | E-Book |
No items available.