opac header

Consent in the law (Record no. 17443)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02264nam a22002291i 4500
005 - DATE & TIME
control field 20220507135637.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 140929s2007 enk ob 001 0 eng d
020 ## - ISBN
International Standard Book Number 9781472563866
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency NLUO
082 04 - DDC NUMBER
Classification number 340.112
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Beyleveld, Deryck,
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Consent in the law
Medium [electronic resource] /
Statement of responsibility, etc. by Deryck Beyleveld and Roger Brownsword.
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Pages 1 online resource (xvii, 388 pages).
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note Bloomsbury Pub Ebook
504 ## - BIBLIOGRAPHY, ETC. NOTE
Bibliography, etc Includes bibliographical references and index.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. "In a community that takes rights seriously, consent features pervasively in both moral and legal discourse as a justifying reason: stated simply, where there is consent, there can be no complaint. However, without a clear appreciation of the nature of a consent-based justification, its integrity, both in principle and in practice, is liable to be compromised. This book examines the role of consent as a procedural justification, discussing the prerequisites for an adequate consent -- in particular, that an agent with the relevant capacity has made an unforced and informed choice, that the consent has been clearly signalled, and that the scope of the authorisation covers the act in question. It goes on to highlight both the Fallacy of Necessity (where there is no consent, there must be a wrong) and the Fallacy of Sufficiency (where there is consent, there cannot be a wrong). Finally, the extent to which the authority of law itself rests on consent is considered. If the familiarity of consent-based justification engenders confusion and contempt, the analysis in this book acts as a corrective, identifying a range of abusive or misguided practices that variously under-value or over-value consent, that fictionalise it or that are fixated by it, and that treat it too casually or too cautiously. In short, the analysis in Consent in the Law points the way towards recognising an important procedural justification for precisely what it is as well as giving it a more coherent application."--Bloomsbury Publishing.
650 #0 - SUBJECT
Subject Consent (Law)
650 #0 - SUBJECT
Subject Law and ethics.
700 1# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Added Entry Personal Name Brownsword, Roger,
856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472563866?locatt=label:secondary_bloomsburyCollections
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type E-Book

No items available.

© National Law University, Odisha | All rights reserved |