Evaluation and legal theory (Record no. 17421)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01975nam a22002291i 4500 |
| 005 - DATE & TIME | |
| control field | 20220507121515.0 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 140929s2001 enk ob 001 0 eng d |
| 020 ## - ISBN | |
| International Standard Book Number | 9781472562364 |
| 040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE | |
| Original cataloging agency | NLUO |
| 082 00 - DDC NUMBER | |
| Classification number | 340/.1 |
| 100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Dickson, Julie, |
| 245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Evaluation and legal theory |
| Medium | [electronic resource] / |
| Statement of responsibility, etc. | Julie Dickson ; general editor John Gardner. |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
| Pages | 1 online resource (xii, 148 pages). |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | Bloomsbury Pub Ebook |
| 504 ## - BIBLIOGRAPHY, ETC. NOTE | |
| Bibliography, etc | Includes bibliographical references and index. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | "If Raz and Dworkin disagree over how law should be characterised,how are we, their jurisprudential public, supposed to go about adjudicating between the rival theories which they offer us? To what considerations would those theorists themselves appeal in order to convince us that their accounts of law are accurate and successful? Moreover, what is it that makes an account of law successful? Evaluation and Legal Theory tackles methodological or meta-theoretical issues such as these, and does so via attempting to answer the question: to what extent, and in what sense, must a legal theorist make value judgements about his data in order to construct a successful theory of law? Dispelling the obfuscatory myth that legal positivism seeks a 'value-free' account of law, the author attempts to explain and defend Joseph Razs position that evaluation is essential to successful legal theory, whilst refuting John Finnis and Ronald Dworkins contentions that the legal theorist must morally evaluate and morally justify the law in order to properly explain its nature. The book does not claim to solve the many mysteries of meta-legal theory but does seek to contribute to and engender rigorous and focused debate on this topic."--Bloomsbury Publishing. |
| 650 #0 - SUBJECT | |
| Subject | Law |
| 650 #0 - SUBJECT | |
| Subject | Values. |
| 700 1# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Added Entry Personal Name | Gardner, John, |
| 856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472562364?locatt=label:secondary_bloomsburyCollections |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Koha item type | E-Book |
No items available.