opac header

Judicial review and the constitution (Record no. 17386)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02143nam a22002171c 4500
005 - DATE & TIME
control field 20220507115642.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 140929s2000 enk ob 100 0 eng d
020 ## - ISBN
International Standard Book Number 9781472558916
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency NLUO
082 00 - DDC NUMBER
Classification number 347.41/012
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Judicial review and the constitution
Medium [electronic resource] /
Statement of responsibility, etc. edited by Christopher Forsyth.
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Pages 1 online resource (xxxvii, 442 pages)
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note Bloomsbury Pub Ebook
504 ## - BIBLIOGRAPHY, ETC. NOTE
Bibliography, etc Includes bibliographical references
520 8# - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. This collection of essays presents opposing sides of the debate over the foundations of judicial review. In this work,however, the discussion of whether the 'ultra vires' doctrine is best characterised as a central principle of administrative law or as a harmless, justificatory fiction is located in the highly topical and political context of constitutional change. The thorough jurisprudential analysis of the relative merits of models of 'legislative intention' and 'judicial creativity' provides a sound base for consideration of the constitutional problems arising out of legislative devolution and the Human Rights Act 1998. As the historical orthodoxy is challenged by growing institutional independence, leading figures in the field offer competing perspectives on the future of judicial review. "Confucius was wrong to say that it is a curse to live in interesting times. We are witnessing the development of a constitutional philosophy which recognises fundamental values and gives them effect in the mediation of law to the people". (Sir John Laws) Contributors Nick Bamforth, Paul Craig, David Dyzenhaus, Mark Elliott, David Feldman, Christopher Forsyth, Brigid Hadfield, Jeffrey Jowell QC, Sir John Laws, Dawn Oliver, Sir Stephen Sedley, Mark Walters. With short responses by: TRS Allan, Stephen Bailey, Robert Carnworth, Martin Loughlin, Michael Taggart, Sir William Wade
650 #0 - SUBJECT
Subject Judicial review of administrative acts
700 1# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Added Entry Personal Name Forsyth, C. F.,
710 2# - ADDED ENTRY--CORPORATE NAME
Name of the body University of Cambridge.
Subordinate Department Centre for Public Law.
856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472558916?locatt=label:secondary_bloomsburyCollections
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type E-Book

No items available.

© National Law University, Odisha | All rights reserved |